• Inicio
  • Quiénes somos
    • ¿Qué es Eben?
    • Congresos Anuales
    • Miembros
    • Junta Directiva
    • ¿Cómo hacerse socio?
  • Opinión
    • En pocas palabras
    • Nuestros socios opinan
  • Noticias
  • Eventos
    • Eventos Eben
    • Otros Eventos
  • Recursos
    • Material docente
    • Publicaciones científicas
    • Hemeroteca
  • Sitios de interés
    • Webs de ética empresarial
    • Blogs
    • Twitter
  • Contacto

EBEN

  • Inicio
  • Quiénes somos
    • ¿Qué es Eben?
    • Congresos Anuales
    • Miembros
    • Junta Directiva
    • ¿Cómo hacerse socio?
  • Opinión
    • En pocas palabras
    • Nuestros socios opinan
  • Noticias
  • Eventos
    • Eventos Eben
    • Otros Eventos
  • Recursos
    • Material docente
    • Publicaciones científicas
    • Hemeroteca
  • Sitios de interés
    • Webs de ética empresarial
    • Blogs
    • Twitter
  • Contacto
Noticias de Ética EmpresarialRecursos

Why Working From Home Might Promote More Ethical

by eben-spain 22 de abril de 2021
22 de abril de 2021
Why Working From Home Might Promote More Ethical

19 de febrero, 2021. – The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed the way we work. In January 2020, only 5.7% of employees worked exclusively at home; by April that figure rose eight-fold to 43.1%. Before the pandemic, just under half of organizations reported that at least half of their staff “flexed” or chose their working hours; that number jumped to 85% during the coronavirus crisis.

Flexible working can enable employees to balance their jobs with their family care responsibilities and public health requirements. Nine out of ten employees who adapted to home working during the lockdown now report wanting to continue working at home in some capacity after a return to offices is permitted.

Although the majority of employers plan to allow some staff to continue flexing their hours after COVID is under control, many are reluctant to do so. Some managers who like to “see” their employees work may doubt they are actually working when they are not are in the office. My research, however, has identified a potential upside of flexible work: more ethical business practices.

Energy and Ethics

We tend to assume that bad people do bad things, and good people do good things—and that we ourselves are good people who don’t cross ethical lines. But employees constantly navigate ethical dilemmas at work, and research has revealed that our ethical behavior fluctuates throughout the day. Anyone can be ethical or unethical in a particular moment, depending on the circumstances.

In particular, research reveals that behaving ethically requires energy, self-control, and effort. As we all know, our energy levels naturally ebb and flow throughout the course of the day. And when our energy is low, we are more likely to behave unethically.

Fatigue research also shows that energy levels follow a predictable daily cycle that is aligned with the circadian process. Individuals have their own natural energy and sleep cycles—some people are “larks” or “morning people” with a circadian rhythm that is shifted earlier in the day. There are also “owls” or “night people,” who experience their higher energy levels later in the day.

Research I conducted with Brian Gunia and Christopher Barnes revealed that larks and owls follow different patterns of ethical and unethical behavior over the course of a typical day. We found that larks are more unethical late at night, when their energy is low, while owls are more unethical early in the morning, when they may feel foggy and tired. This makes sense, as our personal energy is central to resisting temptation. And it suggests that employees will behave most ethically if they have the flexibility to follow their circadian rhythm when setting their work schedules.

Toward more Flexible Work

Managers tend to assume employees who start and finish work later in the day are less conscientious and competent, even if their behavior and performance are exactly the same as someone working an early riser’s schedule.

Contradicting these assumptions, our research suggests that forcing employees to work during times of the day that are unsuited to their chronotype (personal differences in circadian rhythms) risks increasing unethical behavior. Managers who can incorporate flexible working hours could see a rise in ethical decisions in their team.

Employers and employees have faced unprecedented challenges over the last year. Although it is not available to all, flexible working hours could be incorporated wherever possible. Improved business ethics is just one advantage of doing so. Allowing employees the freedom and flexibility to decide when to work has also been shown to improve both business practices and employee well-being. Employers should seize the opportunity to emerge from the pandemic with a better, more agile structure that empowers employees to optimize their energy cycles to everyone’s benefit.

Energy and Ethics

We tend to assume that bad people do bad things, and good people do good things—and that we ourselves are good people who don’t cross ethical lines. But employees constantly navigate ethical dilemmas at work, and research has revealed that our ethical behavior fluctuates throughout the day. Anyone can be ethical or unethical in a particular moment, depending on the circumstances.

In particular, research reveals that behaving ethically requires energy, self-control, and effort. As we all know, our energy levels naturally ebb and flow throughout the course of the day. And when our energy is low, we are more likely to behave unethically.

Fatigue research also shows that energy levels follow a predictable daily cycle that is aligned with the circadian process. Individuals have their own natural energy and sleep cycles—some people are “larks” or “morning people” with a circadian rhythm that is shifted earlier in the day. There are also “owls” or “night people,” who experience their higher energy levels later in the day.

Research I conducted with Brian Gunia and Christopher Barnes revealed that larks and owls follow different patterns of ethical and unethical behavior over the course of a typical day. We found that larks are more unethical late at night, when their energy is low, while owls are more unethical early in the morning, when they may feel foggy and tired. This makes sense, as our personal energy is central to resisting temptation. And it suggests that employees will behave most ethically if they have the flexibility to follow their circadian rhythm when setting their work schedules.

Toward more Flexible Work

Managers tend to assume employees who start and finish work later in the day are less conscientious and competent, even if their behavior and performance are exactly the same as someone working an early riser’s schedule.

Contradicting these assumptions, our research suggests that forcing employees to work during times of the day that are unsuited to their chronotype (personal differences in circadian rhythms) risks increasing unethical behavior. Managers who can incorporate flexible working hours could see a rise in ethical decisions in their team.

Employers and employees have faced unprecedented challenges over the last year. Although it is not available to all, flexible working hours could be incorporated wherever possible. Improved business ethics is just one advantage of doing so. Allowing employees the freedom and flexibility to decide when to work has also been shown to improve both business practices and employee well-being. Employers should seize the opportunity to emerge from the pandemic with a better, more agile structure that empowers employees to optimize their energy cycles to everyone’s benefit.

Published by Forbes

covid-19Ethics Businessforbesonline work
0 comentarios
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsapp

Dejar un comentario Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Al utilizar este formulario, usted acepta el almacenamiento y el manejo de sus datos en este sitio web.

Twitter

EbenspainFollow

Avatar
AvatarEbenspain@Ebenspain·
17 Dic

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7009444492852277248
@Ebenspain @AntArgandona @adomingom @angela_callejon @LeireSanJose @Dolorsseto @abelmonfort #joseluisretolaza #JesusBarrena 2023 #EBEN2023

Reply on Twitter 1604019304520945665Retweet on Twitter 16040193045209456653Like on Twitter 16040193045209456654Twitter 1604019304520945665
Retweet on TwitterEbenspain Retweeted
AvatarEdita Olaizola@EditaOla·
5 Dic

Re inventing Globalization Biomimetic leadership con @Ebenspain @deusto https://youtu.be/v1PPymgk4AI a través de @YouTube

Reply on Twitter 1599808747974512640Retweet on Twitter 15998087479745126401Like on Twitter 15998087479745126401Twitter 1599808747974512640
Retweet on TwitterEbenspain Retweeted
AvatarGEAccounting@GEAccounting·
25 Nov

"No es una guerra entre la contabilidad financiera y la contabilidad social: es un complemento" "La contabilidad social representa la inversión de lo social" "mirar lo social escuchando a los demás" @GEAccounting @upvehu @deustoDBS

Reply on Twitter 1596071870389882882Retweet on Twitter 15960718703898828824Like on Twitter 15960718703898828828Twitter 1596071870389882882

Categorías

  • Destacado (18)
  • En pocas palabras (56)
  • Eventos (114)
  • Eventos Eben (52)
  • Material docente (76)
  • Noticias de Ética Empresarial (278)
  • Nuestros socios opinan (188)
  • Opinión (220)
  • Otros Eventos (84)
  • Recursos (294)

RSS Agustin Domingo

  • Aborto: argumentos y emociones
  • Zorros y erizos van de rebajas
  • Regalar una hucha en Navidad

RSS Antonio Argandoña

  • Un caso de ética
  • La sabiduría de Peter Drucker
  • Construir confianza

RSS Begoña Sánchez Ramos

  • BEGOÑA SÁNCHEZ-RAMOS, PRESIDENTA DE ACROSS INTERNACIONAL, MEDALLA DE ORO AL MÉRITO EN EL TRABAJO Y POR SU COMPROMISO CON LA GESTIÓN DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS EN LA EMPRESA
  • “Empresa con enfoque de Derechos Humanos (DDHH). ¿Cómo lograrlo? Un camino a recorrer por las empresas españolas”
  • Articulo de Begoña Sánchez Ramos publicado en InCOMPLIANCE Revista corporativa de International Compliance Association (ICA) asks how companies can achieve a corporate focus on human rights

RSS Joan Fontrodona

  • Tiempo de prioridades
  • Conservar el planeta, pero… ¿para quién?
  • Etica e Inteligencia Artificial

RSS Edita Olaizola

  • Antropocentrismo y ética
  • ¡Viva la atención al cliente!
  • La Naturaleza nos advierte... y nosotros bailando

Eventos EBEN

  • “Call for papers”. XXX Congreso EBEN-España

    27 de enero de 2023
  • “Call for papers” XXIX Congreso presencial EBEN España 2022

    22 de febrero de 2022
  • 7th ISBEE World Congress Bilbao, Spain | July 20-22, 2022

    15 de diciembre de 2021

Otros eventos

  • Call for papers for the 21th IESE International Symposium on Ethics, Business and Society

    18 de noviembre de 2020
  • Call for papers for the 27th International Vincentian Business Ethics Conference

    2 de abril de 2020
  • Society for Business Ethics – Annual Conference 2020

    14 de diciembre de 2019

Opinión

  • En pocas palabras: La ética es rentable…y en tiempos de pandemia más

    22 de abril de 2021
  • Firma invitada: Sandra Mª Sánchez

    22 de abril de 2021
  • Reconectar lo social en la ética de la empresa

    22 de abril de 2021

Noticias

  • Why Working From Home Might Promote More Ethical

    22 de abril de 2021
  • El sector hotelero apuesta por la economía circular para superar la crisis de la covid-19

    22 de abril de 2021
  • Adela Cortina: “la empresa del futuro será ética, social, verde o no será”

    22 de abril de 2021

Contacta

Twitter Linkedin

Eben Spain

  • ¿Qué es Eben?
  • Congresos Anuales
  • Los miembros de EBEN
  • La Junta Directiva de EBEN
  • ¿Cómo hacerse socio?
  • Newsletter
  • Contacto
  • Aviso Legal

Contenidos

  • En pocas palabras
  • Nuestros socios opinan
  • Noticias de Ética Empresarial
  • Eventos Eben
  • Otros Eventos
  • Material docente
  • Publicaciones científicas
  • Sitios de interés

Hermanos Aguirre, 2
48014 Bilbao


info@eben-spain.org

@2019 - EBEN Spain - Designed by Prestigia