• Inicio
  • Quiénes somos
    • ¿Qué es Eben?
    • Congresos Anuales
    • Miembros
    • Junta Directiva
    • ¿Cómo hacerse socio?
  • Opinión
    • En pocas palabras
    • Nuestros socios opinan
  • Noticias
  • Eventos
    • Eventos Eben
    • Otros Eventos
  • Recursos
    • Material docente
    • Publicaciones científicas
    • Hemeroteca
  • Sitios de interés
    • Webs de ética empresarial
    • Blogs
    • Twitter
  • Contacto

EBEN

  • Inicio
  • Quiénes somos
    • ¿Qué es Eben?
    • Congresos Anuales
    • Miembros
    • Junta Directiva
    • ¿Cómo hacerse socio?
  • Opinión
    • En pocas palabras
    • Nuestros socios opinan
  • Noticias
  • Eventos
    • Eventos Eben
    • Otros Eventos
  • Recursos
    • Material docente
    • Publicaciones científicas
    • Hemeroteca
  • Sitios de interés
    • Webs de ética empresarial
    • Blogs
    • Twitter
  • Contacto
Noticias de Ética EmpresarialRecursos

Standing up for economists

by admin 17 de diciembre de 201718 de diciembre de 2017
17 de diciembre de 201718 de diciembre de 2017

9 de noviembre de 2017 – “WINNING a Nobel prize changes your life,” said Jean Tirole, a French economist, from experience. When his work on competition policy and how to adapt regulation for specific industries earned him the gong in 2014, he could have succumbed to “Nobel prize syndrome”, the tendency to opine on all economic matters regardless of expertise. His book “Economics for the Common Good”, published in 2016 and just released in English, attempts something much bolder. He tries to rescue economists’ reputation.

His profession has been attacked for failing to predict the financial crisis, for pushing competition and markets above all else and for ignoring questions of morality. One academic economist will befuddle you with two contradictory opinions, while another will attack you with impenetrable algebra. No wonder technocrats are losing out to populists.

Some of this criticism is warranted, Mr Tirole accepts. Leading economists prefer to create knowledge rather than disseminate it, and they communicate with each other in a language that can be hard to understand. Although mathematical models add clarity and rigour (and Mr Tirole is a heavy user in his own research), they can constrain which questions are asked, and be mistaken as the goal of research rather than the means.

In some cases, though, critics of economists ask too much of them. Although economists did underestimate the importance of financial regulation in the run-up to the crisis, and oversold the benefits of whizzy new instruments, blaming them for failing to spot something that even financial supervisors had only partial knowledge of seems unfair. Crises often come when an unforeseen but otherwise survivable investor panic becomes self-fulfilling. Knowing when the world will flit between states is impossible.

Mr Tirole spends much of his book reminding readers of what economics is for. It is supposed to serve society, and to offer rigour where gut instincts go wrong. Debates on whether to weaken protection for permanent employees, for example, pit managers against workers who want security. The economist is there to point out the victim hidden by this dichotomy: the person who has no job, or only a short-term contract, because companies are afraid to hire hard-to-fire staff on full contracts.

Economics is perfectly capable of incorporating questions of morality, says Mr Tirole. It simply imposes structure on debate where otherwise indignation would rule. It might make sense to ban some markets, like dwarf-tossing, he says: its existence diminishes the dignity of an entire group. But a market in organs or blood, for example, should not be rejected on the basis of instinctive moral repugnance alone. Policymakers should consider whether payment would raise the supply of donated blood or kidneys, improving or even saving lives. (It might not, if the motivation of money makes generous people afraid of looking greedy.) Whatever the answer, policymakers should make decisions from “behind the veil of ignorance”: without knowing whether any one person, including the policymakers themselves, would be a winner or loser from a particular policy, which society would they choose?

Mr Tirole applies this type of reasoning to topics ranging from carbon taxes to industrial policy, from competition to the digital economy. He presents economists as detectives, sniffing out abuse of market power and identifying trade-offs where populists make empty promises. His analysis is laden with French examples of ill-advised attempts to defy the constraints that those in his discipline delight in pointing out. When in 1996 the French government blocked new large stores in an effort to restrain the power of supermarket chains, share prices of existing ones rose. The new laws inadvertently worsened the problem by restricting competition.

He also depicts economists as ill-equipped to deal with the dirty reality of politics. To those who might be catapulted into sudden stardom as he was, he warns that academic economists will be quickly put into political pigeonholes, and their arguments celebrated or dismissed according to whether the recipient favours that pigeonhole. Though populists revel in simplicity, his aim is to make economics context-specific and point out its complexities. This is his strength, but his discipline’s limitation. He is economists’ defender, but not their saviour.

Publicado en The Economist

Compromiso RSEEmpresas responsablesÉtica FinanzasResponsabilidad SocialRSE
0 comentarios
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsapp

Dejar un comentario Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Al utilizar este formulario, usted acepta el almacenamiento y el manejo de sus datos en este sitio web.

Twitter

EbenspainFollow

Avatar
Retweet on TwitterEbenspain Retweeted
AvatarCIDAF-UCM@cidaf_ucm·
21 Feb

XXX CONGRESO EBEN – Ética y Sostenibilidad: un binomio necesario en el logro de los ODS (8-9 junio 2023. Cádiz) @Ebenspain @IsabelRMora https://cidafucm.es/spip.php?article45372

Reply on Twitter 1628079632040833037Retweet on Twitter 16280796320408330371Like on Twitter 16280796320408330371Twitter 1628079632040833037
Retweet on TwitterEbenspain Retweeted
AvatarGEAccounting@GEAccounting·
23 Feb

#monetizarvalorsocial #socialaccounting #stakeholder @uclm_es #RSE #sostenibilidad @upvehu #JLRetolaza @GEAccounting @LeireSanJose Un placer!

Reply on Twitter 1628605616708022273Retweet on Twitter 16286056167080222734Like on Twitter 16286056167080222737Twitter 1628605616708022273
AvatarEbenspain@Ebenspain·
21 Feb

Calle for Papers open: Cádiz #ethic #stakeholder #virtue #Marketing #EticsinFinance #csr #RSE #sostenibilidad #tesis #premios https://www.eben-spain.org/call-for-papers-xxx-congreso-eben-espana/
Envía ahora tu ponencia o proyecto. ¡Puede ser premiado!

Reply on Twitter 1627896573827989509Retweet on Twitter 16278965738279895093Like on Twitter 16278965738279895093Twitter 1627896573827989509

Categorías

  • Destacado (18)
  • En pocas palabras (56)
  • Eventos (114)
  • Eventos Eben (52)
  • Material docente (76)
  • Noticias de Ética Empresarial (278)
  • Nuestros socios opinan (188)
  • Opinión (220)
  • Otros Eventos (84)
  • Recursos (294)

RSS Agustin Domingo

  • De Bergoglio a Francisco
  • Presentación Homo Curans, U.P. Comillas, 8 febrero 2023
  • Presentación HOMO CURANS en CEU Colomina 8 de marzo de 2023

RSS Antonio Argandoña

  • La sociedad civil (I)
  • Para ejercitar la paciencia
  • Para qué sirven las virtudes

RSS Begoña Sánchez Ramos

  • BEGOÑA SÁNCHEZ-RAMOS, PRESIDENTA DE ACROSS INTERNACIONAL, MEDALLA DE ORO AL MÉRITO EN EL TRABAJO Y POR SU COMPROMISO CON LA GESTIÓN DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS EN LA EMPRESA
  • “Empresa con enfoque de Derechos Humanos (DDHH). ¿Cómo lograrlo? Un camino a recorrer por las empresas españolas”
  • Articulo de Begoña Sánchez Ramos publicado en InCOMPLIANCE Revista corporativa de International Compliance Association (ICA) asks how companies can achieve a corporate focus on human rights

RSS Joan Fontrodona

  • Tiempo de prioridades
  • Conservar el planeta, pero… ¿para quién?
  • Etica e Inteligencia Artificial

RSS Edita Olaizola

  • Un coach abejorro
  • Antropocentrismo y ética
  • ¡Viva la atención al cliente!

Eventos EBEN

  • CALL FOR PAPERS FOR THE 15TH RAMON LLULL JOURNAL OF APPLIED ETHICS

    20 de marzo de 2023
  • “Call for papers”. XXX Congreso EBEN-España

    27 de enero de 2023
  • “Call for papers” XXIX Congreso presencial EBEN España 2022

    22 de febrero de 2022

Otros eventos

  • Call for papers for the 21th IESE International Symposium on Ethics, Business and Society

    18 de noviembre de 2020
  • Call for papers for the 27th International Vincentian Business Ethics Conference

    2 de abril de 2020
  • Society for Business Ethics – Annual Conference 2020

    14 de diciembre de 2019

Opinión

  • En pocas palabras: La ética es rentable…y en tiempos de pandemia más

    22 de abril de 2021
  • Firma invitada: Sandra Mª Sánchez

    22 de abril de 2021
  • Reconectar lo social en la ética de la empresa

    22 de abril de 2021

Noticias

  • Why Working From Home Might Promote More Ethical

    22 de abril de 2021
  • El sector hotelero apuesta por la economía circular para superar la crisis de la covid-19

    22 de abril de 2021
  • Adela Cortina: “la empresa del futuro será ética, social, verde o no será”

    22 de abril de 2021

Contacta

Twitter Linkedin

Eben Spain

  • ¿Qué es Eben?
  • Congresos Anuales
  • Los miembros de EBEN
  • La Junta Directiva de EBEN
  • ¿Cómo hacerse socio?
  • Newsletter
  • Contacto
  • Aviso Legal

Contenidos

  • En pocas palabras
  • Nuestros socios opinan
  • Noticias de Ética Empresarial
  • Eventos Eben
  • Otros Eventos
  • Material docente
  • Publicaciones científicas
  • Sitios de interés

Hermanos Aguirre, 2
48014 Bilbao


info@eben-spain.org

@2019 - EBEN Spain - Designed by Prestigia